Skip to content
PALS Network
Program for Academic Leaders in Life Science
Skip to content
Home
About PALS
Fellows
Calls
Awarded Grants
Annual Meetings
Event 2024
Event 2023
Event 2022
Event 2021
Event 2020
Event 2019
Event 2018
News
Home
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation - NMMP 2020
Please mark your overall impression of the NMMP Annual Meeting
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 is the lowest possible grade, 10 is the best.
Was the length of the meeting appropriate?
Yes, the time was appropriate.
No, it was too short.
No, it was too long.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This meeting gave me increased knowledge and new tools in how to build sustainable relations.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The meeting has inspired me to develop as a research leader.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The session with Emmanuelle Charpentier (lecture + discussion) was valuable to me.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I know how to use the research infrastructures and who to contact.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I increased my knowledge about the presented research infrastructures.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I intend to explore the use of a SciLifeLab facility for my own research.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Brief comment
Please grade the following concepts
Information before the event
1
2
3
4
5
Please grade with 1 being the worst and 5 the best.
Overall quality of food during the event
1
2
3
4
5
Poster Sessions
1
2
3
4
5
Conference Booklet
1
2
3
4
5
Mingle & Networking opportunities
1
2
3
4
5
The Venue (Elite Hotel Mimer)
1
2
3
4
5
Brief comment
If you have any additional comments, please describe them briefly above.
Please grade the following parts of the programme
Pitch your poster
1
2
3
4
5
Getting to know Infrastructures at SciLifeLab and Umeå University
1
2
3
4
5
Fellows as Moderators
1
2
3
4
5
Discussion with Emmanuelle Charpentier
1
2
3
4
5
Presentations from WCMM and SciLifeLab Group Leaders
1
2
3
4
5
Brief comment
If you have any additional comments, please describe them briefly above.
Suggestions for the future
This is what I suggest is the most important item to IMPROVE for future NMMP Annual Meetings
This is what I suggest is the most important item to KEEP for future NMMP Annual Meetings
What topics would you like to see covered in the next NMMP Annual Meeting in Linköping?
Submit
Comments are closed.